Maxwell screen contax 645 full size#
Maxwell screen contax 645 iso#

For these tests I shot with the cameras on Aperture priority mode letting the cameras choose exposure and shutter speed so we can see what the output would be with each camera and testing their exposure system at the same time. The Fuji is doing what it has always done.overexpose a little bit.which makes me wonder why Fuji has not tweaked their exposure system yet. The Olympus did VERY well considering it has a much smaller sensor and form what everyone says вЂњan inferior lensвЂќ (though I do not feel that way as I feel the 17 1.8 is superb. This is what I have seen in earlier tests as well.

Maxwell screen contax 645 full size#

If you view each image above in its full size form you will see the Sony pulled out the most detail all across the board. These are direct from RAW and what you see is what you get.ДЇuji X-E2 вЂ“ 23 1.4 at f/4 вЂ“ always loveВ the Fuji blues! TIP!! To see these in full size RIGHT CLICK the image and choose вЂњOpen in a new WindowвЂќ or вЂњOpen in a new TabвЂќ and this way you will see the full size file open in your browser. Warmest rendering came from the Oly.ДЄNY of the above images would be acceptable for me yet each have small color differences and DOF differences (which is due to sensor size and aperture). The Olympus E-M1 вЂ“ 17 1.8 at f/2 вЂ“ click it for larger. The Sony A7 and 35 2.8 at 2.8 вЂ“ click it for larger!! FROM RAW NOT wide open so this will bring the sharpest performance. Which one do you prefer?Д«E SURE TO CLICK ON THE IMAGES FOR LARGER 1800 PIXEL WIDE VIEW!ДЎst up the Fuji X-E2 with the 23 1.4 at f/2.8. All three images below are from RAW without enhancements. The 1st one below is just a simple portrait and I wanted to see which rendering I liked the best as well as what color signature I enjoyed the most. I only shot TWO images to compare these three cameras. FujiвЂ™s EVF was the smallest, darkest and least sharp of the three. Crystal clear, huge and nice color accuracy. The EVF here was the best of the lot by quite a large margin.

Maxwell screen contax 645 iso#

You will see some noise even at base ISO though when doing pixel peeps. The color from the E-M1 is the most to my liking out of all three of these cameras as is the build, usability and feel. The 17 1.8 is technically the least sharp of all of the lenses used yet it hung in there with nice sharpness and a great rendering (see portrait of Debby). During use it was the fastest to Auto Focus, the fastest to respond and with that 5-Axis IS was a joy to use even in low light. The Olympus E-M1 is my 2013 camera of the year and for good reason. I did notice that in low light situations the ISO would have to be pumped up due to the slower f/2.8 lens so I am hoping for some faster primes to come along from Sony. Overall a great experience once again with the A7 and Zeiss 35 2.8. No missed focus shots with the A7 and this combo is SMALLER than the APS-C Fuji X-E2 and 23 1.4. IQ was rather вЂњfull frameвЂќ like of course as it is indeed a full frame sensor. With the 35 2.8 I had no issues with auto focus and it was just as fast as the Fuji X-E2 with 23 1.4 I had no issues focusing at night or with light. Still, like I said, the best X to date IMO. The wake up time from sleep was slow as molasses though and caused me to miss a few shots whole walking around. The AWB was the worst with the X-E2 out of the three cameras I was shooting with but I did not have any focus issues when out in Vegas shooting unlike in my dim house during the 1st couple of days. All of my X-E2 shooting was done with this lens. The lens is sharp, fast to Auto Focus and well made. The 23 1.4 is a sweet lens and the built in aperture ring just adds to the experience of using the lens. It is fast, responsive and feels NOTHING like the early days of the X-Pro 1 and X-E1. I can safely say that the X-E2 is the best Fuji interchangeable lens body I have used to date (and I have used them all extensively). When I say вЂњsee which one I liked bestвЂќ I mean image quality, rendering and usability of the camera itself. I mainly shot with the Fuji.say.85% of the time as I will be doing a review of it here soon but just for fun (key words, вЂњjust for funвЂќ) decided to take a couple of similar shots from each camera to see which one I liked best. Just got back from a quick 24 hour trip to Vegas and snapped a few shots while there with the Fuji X-E2 and 23 1.4, the Sony A7 and 35 2.8 and the Olympus E-M1 and 17 1.8. Well here it is! The one many of you have been waiting for, lol. Quick Comparison: Fuji X-E2, Sony A7 and Olympus E-M1